Amazon SageMaker
Qwak
vs

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak

Compare Amazon SageMaker with Qwak by the following set of capabilities. We want you to choose the best ML platform for you.

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Ease of Use

Feature
Zero-config model build & deploy
X
V
Data source integration
AWS data sources
Snowflake, MongoDB, BigQuery, Athena, Redshift and more
Multi-cloud support
AWS
AWS, GCP
Intuitive UI
X
V
Support
Standard AWS support
24/7 by ML engineering experts

Amazon SageMaker ease of use

SageMaker, though powerful, demands a solid grasp of AWS and engineering expertise. Its UI is less intuitive than specialized platforms, requiring navigation and expertise through multiple AWS services.

Qwak ease of use

Designed with a user-friendly interface, Qwak aims to make the MLOps process as straightforward as possible. The platform is built to be intuitive, allowing users to focus on machine learning tasks without the distraction of complex configurations.

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Model Building and Model Deployment

Feature
Model build system
X
V
Model deployment & serving
V
V
Real-time model endpoints
Engineers required
V
Model auto scaling
Engineers required
V
Model A/B deployments
Engineers required
V
Inference analytics
Engineers required
V
Managed notebooks
V
V
Automatic model retraining
Engineers required
V

Amazon SageMaker model building and model deployment

SageMaker does not have Training Jobs or simple deployment, and its Experiments feature and Studio IDE introduce complexity. The deployment and monitoring processes entail manual engineering setup, with limited out-of-the-box support.

Qwak model building and model deployment

Qwak is designed to abstract away most of the engineering complexities, allowing data scientists and ML engineers to focus on what they do best: building and deploying models. The platform handles everything from data storage to model monitoring, reducing the need for specialized engineering skills.

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Feature Platform

Feature
Managed feature store
V
V
Vector database
V
V
Batch features
Engineers required
V
Realtime features
Engineers required
V
Streaming features
Engineers required
V
Streaming aggregation features
X
V
Online and offline store auto sync
X
V

Amazon SageMaker feature platform

The AWS Sagemaker Feature Store requires manual setup for feature processes and lacks support for streaming aggregations, necessitating additional services like Elasticsearch, Chorma, Pinecone, and others for similar functionality.

Qwak feature platform

Qwak provides a fully abstracted environment, allowing users to focus on ML tasks without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. It supports both CPU and GPU instances and can run on AWS or GCP.

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Pricing

Amazon SageMaker pricing

SageMaker offers a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model that's ideal for various project sizes. Users can choose between On-Demand Pricing, with no minimum fees or upfront commitments, and the SageMaker Savings Plans, which provide a flexible, usage-based pricing model in exchange for a consistent

Qwak feature platform

Qwak pricing is measured in QPU or Qwak Processing Units. All the compute resources are measured on a pay-as-you-go basis, or with pre-commitment discounts.

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Maintenance

Amazon SageMaker maintenance

Amazon SageMaker's maintenance can be challenging primarily due to its complex features and deep AWS integration. Engineers must navigate a steep learning curve to effectively utilize its extensive options, manage intricate configurations within the AWS ecosystem, and stay updated with frequent service updates.

Qwak maintenance

Qwak offers a fully managed platform that simplifies the maintenance and updating of models in production for its users. It effectively removes the necessity for users to deal with any infrastructure or engineering-related tasks, streamlining the entire process.

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Scalability

Amazon SageMaker scalabilty

Integrated deeply with Amazon Web Services (AWS), SageMaker leverages AWS's vast infrastructure for significant scalability. This integration makes it a robust solution for organizations with dynamic or growing workloads and those already embedded within the AWS ecosystem while might be changing

Qwak scalability

Qwak supports ML projects at any scale, accommodating both small and large ML initiatives. Use Qwak’s auto scaling features to scale your models automatically

Amazon SageMaker vs. Qwak on Support

Amazon SageMaker support

Support is provided through the standard AWS support system.

Qwak support

Qwak offers 24/7 support by top ML engineering experts via Slack, console chat or Zoom.

Compare Amazon SageMaker with Others

vs.

Don’t just take our word for it

OpenWeb, a social engagement platform that builds online communities around better conversations, needed a way to scale their expanding data science team’s efforts and show immediate value.

Read Case Study

People ask me how I managed to deploy so many models while onboarding a new team within a year. My answer is: JFrog ML.