Qwak
Databricks
vs

Qwak vs. Databricks

Compare Qwak with Databricks by the following set of capabilities. We want you to choose the best ML platform for you.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Ease of Use

Feature
Zero-config model build & deploy
V
X
Data source integration
Snowflake, MongoDB, BigQuery, Athena, Redshift and more
Multiple data sources
Multi-cloud support
AWS, GCP
AWS, GCP, Azure
Intuitive UI
V
X
Support
24/7 by ML engineering experts
Standard

Qwak ease of use

Designed with a user-friendly interface, Qwak aims to make the MLOps process as straightforward as possible. The platform is built to be intuitive, allowing users to focus on machine learning tasks without the distraction of complex configurations.

Databricks ease of use

Databricks leverages open-source tools like Apache Spark, MLflow and Airflow, which offer a lot of configurability but can be complex for some users. While it provides a robust set of features for big data analytics, it may lack specific out-of-the-box ML features, requiring users to build custom solutions using Spark. This adds a layer of complexity and requires a deeper understanding of the underlying technologies.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Model Building and Model Deployment

Feature
Model build system
V
Engineers required
Model deployment & serving
V
V
Real-time model endpoints
V
V
Model auto scaling
V
Engineers required
Model A/B deployments
V
Engineers required
Inference analytics
V
Engineers required
Managed notebooks
V
V
Automatic model retraining
V
Engineers required

Qwak model building and model deployment

Qwak is designed to abstract away most of the engineering complexities, allowing data scientists and ML engineers to focus on what they do best: building and deploying models. The platform handles everything from data storage to model monitoring, reducing the need for specialized engineering skills.

Databricks model building and model deployment

Databricks, a cloud-based platform integrating with various providers, heavily relies on Apache Spark for data processing. While it manages some infrastructure aspects, users need a good grasp of Spark configurations. In contrast. Databricks' deployment time varies; simple models can take minutes, but complex scenarios may extend to days, particularly without prior Spark experience. This variability, while enhancing flexibility, introduces complexity impacting deployment speed.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Feature Platform

Feature
Managed feature store
V
V
Vector database
V
V
Batch features
V
V
Realtime features
V
V
Streaming features
V
V
Streaming aggregation features
V
Engineers required
Online and offline store auto sync
V
Engineers required

Qwak feature platform

Qwak provides a fully abstracted environment, allowing users to focus on ML tasks without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. It supports both CPU and GPU instances and can run on AWS or GCP.

Databricks feature platform

Databricks offers a Feature Store that supports batch data sources and allows for feature transformations using Spark SQL or PySpark functions. Features can be stored in both an Offline and Online Store but require manual schema definition. While it supports a range of data sources, it is optimized for the Databricks ecosystem. Streaming data sources and streaming aggregations are not natively supported.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Pricing

Qwak pricing

Qwak pricing is measured in QPU or Qwak Processing Units. All the compute resources are measured on a pay-as-you-go basis, or with pre-commitment discounts.

Databricks feature platform

Databricks' pricing is based on usage, which means users pay for the resources they consume, while they can also opt for longer commitment plans with discounts.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Maintenance

Qwak maintenance

Qwak offers a fully managed platform that simplifies the maintenance and updating of models in production for its users. It effectively removes the necessity for users to deal with any infrastructure or engineering-related tasks, streamlining the entire process.

Databricks maintenance

Maintaining Databricks effectively in MLOps requires focus on several key areas: efficient cluster management for performance and cost, stringent data management for quality and security, and thorough job scheduling and monitoring. It's important to have the right training and support, ensure reliable disaster recovery and backups, and continuously tune performance, all essential for Databricks to function optimally in the MLOps pipeline.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Scalability

Qwak scalabilty

Qwak supports ML projects at any scale, accommodating both small and large ML initiatives. Use Qwak’s auto scaling features to scale your models automatically

Databricks scalability

Databricks provides scalability through its integrated Spark clusters. This makes it an excellent choice for big data and data engineering tasks, alongside ML workloads.

Qwak vs. Databricks on Support

Qwak support

Qwak offers 24/7 support by top ML engineering experts via Slack, console chat or Zoom.

Databricks support

Databricks has an active community and offers different support options, including premium support plans. Users can access resources like documentation, forums, and customer support for assistance.

Compare Qwak with Others

Don’t just take our word for it

OpenWeb, a social engagement platform that builds online communities around better conversations, needed a way to scale their expanding data science team’s efforts and show immediate value.

Read Case Study

People ask me how I managed to deploy so many models while onboarding a new team within a year. My answer is: JFrog ML.

More on Qwak vs. Databricks